White House Seeks Financial Crisis-Era Powers to Buttress Economy – The New York Times

World Economy

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin says he will ask Congress to reinstate authorities that were scaled back by the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s comments suggest that the White House is bracing for a widespread downturn that could harm sectors well beyond the travel and cruise ship industries.Credit…Erin Schaff/The New York Times

WASHINGTON — Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said on Sunday that he would ask Congress to reinstate powers that were used during the 2008 financial crisis to support the economy as the coronavirus threatens to grind business activity in the United States to a halt.

The comments suggest that the White House is bracing for a widespread downturn that could harm sectors well beyond the travel and cruise ship industries, and that the federal government could need to return to the type of crisis-era measures that were ultimately scaled back by lawmakers in the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act.

Mr. Mnuchin and Jerome H. Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve, have spoken daily about how to buttress the economy, which faces the prospect of a deep recession as the coronavirus spreads around the world.

“Certain tools were taken away that I’m going to go back to Congress and ask for,” Mr. Mnuchin said on “This Week” on ABC.

He did not specify which tools he was referring to, and a Treasury spokesman declined to comment. In a separate interview on “Fox News Sunday,” Mr. Mnuchin made clear that he meant regulations that were imposed by Dodd-Frank.

That law, passed after the worst financial crisis in decades, took away the Fed’s power to lend to individual failing companies or to take assets off their balance sheets, requiring the central bank to extend emergency credit only through broad-based facilities intended to help the financial system as a whole. Congress also took away Treasury’s ability to use a program, known as the Exchange Stabilization Fund, to guarantee money market funds.

The Fed has already cut interest rates by a half percentage point and is widely expected to usher in another cut at its policy meeting this week. Yet the scope of the Federal Reserve’s role as a lender of last resort remains a subject of debate; it is not certain how the central bank will be able to combat economic fallout from a virus that is disrupting businesses across the globe.

Get an informed guide to the global outbreak with our daily coronavirus newsletter.

While the Dodd-Frank Act did take away some of the Fed’s tools, former regulators say the situation facing the economy today may not be best solved with the crisis-era measures that were used in 2008 and beyond. Instead, Congress and the White House may need to deploy other programs to help prop up affected industries.

“There were a number of tools taken away that shouldn’t have been taken away,” said Ben S. Bernanke, who was the Federal Reserve chair during the 2008 financial crisis. “If they’re willing to rethink some of those things, that’s a good thing,” but most of the Fed’s use of such tools pertained to the financial sector “that doesn’t seem to be where the problem is now.”

“In 2008 the problem was that major financial firms were facing runs,” he said, and therefore needed cash. “In this situation, the nonfinancial corporates are where the problem is — that is, think about an airline or a restaurant” that is unable to make payroll.

When it comes to preventing such disruptions, Mr. Bernanke said, “that is something, in the first line of defense, that Congress can do.”

The Fed did some lending aimed at nonfinancial companies — including through its commercial paper funding facility and the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, which helped meet household and small-business credit needs — and authority for those programs still exists. For corporate bailouts, Mr. Bernanke said, lawmakers should be the first line of defense.

“It’s more democratic and accountable if Congress were to take the lead,” he said.

Henry M. Paulson Jr., who was President George W. Bush’s Treasury secretary in 2008, wrote in a Washington Post op-ed last week that one of the lessons from that crisis was that the executive branch might need more authority from Congress to take quick action.

“Notwithstanding tensions between the parties and between the branches, it may be necessary to give the administration broad authority and flexibility to act, within the parameters and oversight structure set by the legislature,” Mr. Paulson wrote. “Congress can’t design and implement every stimulus program or turn on a dime to give new authorities to the executive when facts on the ground change.”

Hal Scott, an emeritus professor at Harvard Law School and the director of the nonprofit Committee on Capital Markets Regulation, said the Fed must restore its ability to be the world’s most powerful lender of last resort. It was unfortunate that such authorities needed to be reinstated amid a crisis, he said.

“It would have been better to do it before the crisis,” Mr. Scott said. “When you get into a crisis and you do it, there’s a concern that you’re sending a panic signal — that we’ve got to do this, we need this power.”

Even without renewed authorities, economists have widely speculated that the Fed could dust off its crisis-era playbook, reviving programs to help companies and financial institutions to weather the shock of the coronavirus. Michael Feroli, an economist at J.P. Morgan, has suggested that the Fed could use another program like the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, or TALF, to help keep credit flowing to households and businesses because “the financial viability of some small businesses is a central concern right now.”

That could also include a Fed program to help corporations that issue short-term debt as a source of funding, known as commercial paper.

Krishna Guha and Ernie Tedeschi at Evercore ISI, an investment banking advisory firm, now expect the Fed to add a commercial paper funding facility “to what we see as an imminent super-aggressive package of measures to mitigate the virus shock and stabilize fixed income and credit markets.”

They said they saw increasing evidence that such a commercial paper measure — which would provide credit to companies to help keep them functioning — is immediately necessary, and speculated that an announcement could come as soon as Sunday or Monday.

Congress has so far taken incremental steps to provide financial help. The House voted early Saturday to pass an economic relief bill that Mr. Mnuchin and Speaker Nancy Pelosi had negotiated to help small businesses cover costs associated with the coronavirus, such as sick leave. It also provides free coronavirus testing and funding for food stamps, among other measures. The Senate is expected to vote on the legislation on Monday.

Mr. Mnuchin said in statement on Saturday evening that in enforcing the law, Treasury would use its regulatory authority to allow employers to use cash deposited with the Internal Revenue Service to pay sick leave wages, and that it would make advances to small businesses that do not have sufficient taxes to draw from to cover such costs.

Despite Mr. Mnuchin’s comments about preparing for a crisis, Trump administration officials continued to express optimism that any economic disruption would be short-lived.

The Treasury secretary said he did not believe that the United States economy was currently in a recession and predicted that economic activity would pick up again after the virus was successfully confronted.

Speaking on “Face the Nation” on CBS, the White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow said he hoped the Senate would quickly pass the House legislation. The administration was considering additional proposals to help airlines, which the White House would discuss on Capitol Hill this week, he said, including potential loan guarantees.

Mr. Kudlow acknowledged that the economic situation would be “very challenging in the short run,” but he said that American supply chains were continuing to flow and that the United States would be back to a strong economy by the end of this year.

Ana Swanson contributed reporting.

    • What is a coronavirus?
      It is a novel virus named for the crownlike spikes that protrude from its surface. The coronavirus can infect both animals and people and can cause a range of respiratory illnesses from the common cold to lung lesions and pneumonia.
    • How contagious is the virus?
      It seems to spread very easily from person to person, especially in homes, hospitals and other confined spaces. The pathogen can travel through the air, enveloped in tiny respiratory droplets that are produced when a sick person breathes, talks, coughs or sneezes.
    • Where has the virus spread?
      The virus, which originated in Wuhan, China, has sickened more than 154,800 in at least 130 countries and more than 5,700 have died. The spread has slowed in China but is gaining speed in Europe and the United States. World Health Organization officials said the outbreak qualifies as a pandemic.
    • What symptoms should I look out for?
      Symptoms, which can take between two to 14 days to appear, include fever, a dry cough, fatigue and difficulty breathing or shortness of breath. Milder cases may resemble the flu or a bad cold, but people may be able to pass on the virus even before they develop symptoms.
    • What if I’m traveling?
      The State Department has issued a global Level 3 health advisory telling United States citizens to “reconsider travel” to all countries because of the worldwide effects of the coronavirus. This is the department’s second-highest advisory.
    • How long will it take to develop a treatment or vaccine?
      Several drugs are being tested, and some initial findings are expected soon. A vaccine to stop the spread is still at least a year away.